Annotated-Bibliography-for-the-Article-Review-Final-Paper-psychology-homework-help
Do you find it challenging to create a well-crafted and comprehensive paper? Are you feeling overwhelmed by the considerable time and effort required to create an excellent piece? If you’re in search of the best online paper writing service to support your academic needs, search no more. Our proficient team of professional writers, renowned for delivering top-notch papers, backed by outstanding reviews for our writing services, is here to assist you.
Eliteresearchpapers.com ensure the utmost quality of our work, ensuring that each paper we provide is entirely unique. Every paper is written from scratch, meticulously examined for any signs of plagiarism, and edited to meet the most rigorous standards. Furthermore, we employ advanced software tools to detect any instances of plagiarism or errors in your paper prior to its delivery.
Annotated Bibliography for the Article Review Final Paper
This week, you will research and create an annotated bibliography of five peer-reviewed articles that were published within the last 10 years and relate to the article you selected in Week Two for your Article Review. The peer-reviewed articles you select should be researched in the Ashford University Library and represent a variety of viewpoints on the subject matter. They may support or refute the information presented in your chosen article for review. Each of the peer-reviewed articles must include a complete reference that is correctly formatted in APA style as outlined by the Ashford Writing Center and an annotation of five to six well-developed sentences in your own words that summarize the source and describe its applicability to your selected topic. Please note that no sections from the abstracts of the articles should be included in your annotation.
In your annotation for each peer-reviewed article, analyze psychology as a science as it is presented in the article and explain how it relates to this particular topic. Assess the professional roles presented in the article and describe how they relate to the roles as presented in the article you have chosen for review. Explain any psychological theoretical perspectives presented in the article and how they either support or refute the information provided in the review article. Evaluate contemporary applications of psychology as they are described in the article and compare these to the descriptions within the article for review.
Save your time - order a paper!
Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines
Order Paper NowFor more in-depth assistance with your annotated bibliography, please visit the Ashford Writing Center located under the Learning Resources tab in the left-hand navigation panel of your online course.
The Annotated Bibliography:
- Must be two to three double-spaced pages in length and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
- Must include a title page with the following:
- Title of paper
- Student’s name
- Course name and number
- Instructor’s name
- Date submitted
- Must use at least five peer-reviewed sources.
- Must provide a well-developed summary for each source used.
- Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
PSY600.W4A1.09.2014
Description:
Total Possible Score: 25.00
Annotated Bibliography
Total: 4.50
Distinguished – Uses a minimum of five peer reviewed articles published within the last 10 years with each source appropriately selected, correctly cited, and includes a paragraph containing at least five- to-six well developed sentences for each one.
Proficient – Uses a minimum of five peer reviewed articles published within the last 10 years. The sources are mostly appropriately selected, cited, and include a paragraph containing at least five- to-six developed sentences for each one. Minor details are missing or inaccurate.
Basic – Uses a minimum of five peer reviewed articles published within the last 10 years. The sources are somewhat appropriately selected, cited, and include a paragraph containing at least five- to-six somewhat developed sentences for each one. Relevant details are missing or inaccurate.
Below Expectations – Uses a minimum of four peer reviewed articles published within the last 10 years. Each one includes a summary paragraph containing at least four-to-five sentences. The sources may not be appropriately selected or cited. Significant details are missing or inaccurate.
Non-Performance – The annotated bibliography uses fewer than four sources, or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions, or is nonexistent.
Analyzes Psychology As a Science as it is Presented in the Article and Explains how it Relates to the Topic of the Review Article
Total: 4.50
Distinguished – Each annotation clearly and comprehensively analyzes psychology as a science as it is presented in the article and explains how it relates to the topic of the review article.
Proficient – Each annotation analyzes psychology as a science as it is presented in the article and explains how it relates to the topic of the review article. Minor details are missing or unclear.
Basic – Annotations partially analyze psychology as a science as it is presented in the article and explain in part how it relates to the topic of the review article. Relevant details are missing or unclear.
Below Expectations – Annotations attempt to analyze psychology as a science as it is presented in the article and explain how it relates to the topic of the review article. Significant details are missing and/or inaccurate.
Non-Performance – The analysis is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Assesses the Professional Roles Presented in the Article and Describes How it Relates to the Roles as Presented in the Article Chosen for Review
Total: 3.50
Distinguished – Provides a thorough assessment of the professional roles presented in each article and describes how it relates to the roles as presented in the article chosen for review.
Proficient – Assesses the professional roles presented in each article and describes how it relates to the roles as presented in the article chosen for review. Minor details are missing or unclear.
Basic – Provides a minimal assessment of the professional roles presented in each article and how it relates to the roles as presented in the article chosen for review. Relevant details are missing or inaccurate.
Below Expectations – Attempts to provide an assessment of the professional roles presented in each article and how it relates to the roles as presented in the article chosen for review. Significant details are missing and/or inaccurate.
Non-Performance – The assessment of professional roles presented in each article and how it relates to the roles as presented in the article chosen for review is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Explains Any Psychological Theoretical Perspectives Presented in the Article and How They Either Support or Refute the Information Provided in the Review Article
Total: 3.50
Distinguished – Thoroughly and accurately explains the psychological theoretical perspectives presented in each article and how they either support or refute the information provided in the review article.
Proficient – Explains the psychological theoretical perspectives presented in each article and how they either support or refute the information provided in the review article. Minor details are missing or inaccurate.
Basic – Minimally explains the psychological theoretical perspectives presented in the articles and how they either support or refute the information provided in the review article. Relevant details are missing or inaccurate.
Below Expectations – Attempts to explain the psychological theoretical perspectives presented in the articles and how they either support or refute the information provided in the review article. Significant details are missing and/or inaccurate.
Non-Performance – The explanation of psychological theoretical perspectives presented in the articles and how they either support or refute the information provided in the review article is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Evaluates Contemporary Applications of Psychology as They are Described in Each of the Articles and Compares These to the Descriptions Within the Article Chosen for Review
Total: 3.50
Distinguished – Each annotation clearly and comprehensively evaluates contemporary applications of psychology as they are described in each of the articles and thoroughly compares these to the descriptions within the article chosen for review.
Proficient – Each annotation evaluates contemporary applications of psychology as they are described in each of the articles and compares these to the descriptions within the article chosen for review. Minor details are missing or unclear.
Basic – Annotations minimally evaluate contemporary applications of psychology as they are described in each article and vaguely compares these to the descriptions within the article chosen for review. Relevant details are missing or unclear.
Below Expectations – Annotations attempt to evaluate contemporary applications of psychology as described in each of the articles and compare these to the descriptions within the article chosen for review; however, significant details are missing and/or unclear.
Non-Performance -The evaluation is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Critical Thinking: Explanation of Issues
Total: 2.00
Distinguished – Clearly and comprehensively explains the issue to be considered, delivering all relevant information necessary for a full understanding.
Proficient – Clearly explains the issue to be considered, delivering enough relevant information for an adequate understanding.
Basic – Briefly explains the issue to be considered, delivering minimal information for a basic understanding.
Below Expectations – Briefly explains the issue to be considered, but may not deliver additional information necessary for a basic understanding.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Content Development
Total: 2.00
Distinguished – Uses appropriate, pertinent, and persuasive content to discover and develop sophisticated ideas within the context of the discipline, shaping the work as a whole.
Proficient – Uses appropriate and pertinent content to discover ideas within the context of the discipline, shaping the work as a whole.
Basic – Uses appropriate and pertinent content but does not apply it toward discovering or developing ideas. Overall, content assists in shaping the written work.
Below Expectations – Uses content, though it may be unrelated or inappropriate to the topic. Content does not contribute toward the development of the written work and may distract the reader from its purpose.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
Total: 0.50
Distinguished – Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.
Proficient – Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.
Basic – Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.
Below Expectations – Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: APA Formatting
Total: 0.50
Distinguished – Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.
Proficient – Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.
Basic – Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements.
Below Expectations – Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Page Requirement
Total: 0.25
Distinguished – The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Proficient – The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Basic – The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Below Expectations – The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Resource Requirement
Total: 0.25
Distinguished – Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
Proficient – Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
Basic – Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.
Below Expectations – Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Powered by